<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Pixars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storkpigelephant.com/2008/04/17/future-pixars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storkpigelephant.com/2008/04/17/future-pixars/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:51:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ZoltarStark</title>
		<link>http://storkpigelephant.com/2008/04/17/future-pixars/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>ZoltarStark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storkpigelephant.com/2008/04/17/future-pixars/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>my eyes haven&#039;t seen the number 2009 in your post and they concluded &quot;no film in this year&quot; even that &quot;next year&quot; means exactly that :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my eyes haven&#8217;t seen the number 2009 in your post and they concluded &#8220;no film in this year&#8221; even that &#8220;next year&#8221; means exactly that <img src='http://storkpigelephant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lobeznoUK</title>
		<link>http://storkpigelephant.com/2008/04/17/future-pixars/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>lobeznoUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storkpigelephant.com/2008/04/17/future-pixars/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>we have Pixar&#039;s UP in 2009!! :) 

And imdb has some part of it which has been paying only viewing. It is just for new movies in production that have not yet started to be produced, they are in the super-pre-production part of it. :) It is mainly just for people that work in the industry... They become all-inclusive (i.e. non paying) after a while. :)

And I think Toy Story 2 is far better than Toy Story...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have Pixar&#8217;s UP in 2009!! <img src='http://storkpigelephant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>And imdb has some part of it which has been paying only viewing. It is just for new movies in production that have not yet started to be produced, they are in the super-pre-production part of it. <img src='http://storkpigelephant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It is mainly just for people that work in the industry&#8230; They become all-inclusive (i.e. non paying) after a while. <img src='http://storkpigelephant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And I think Toy Story 2 is far better than Toy Story&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZoltarStark</title>
		<link>http://storkpigelephant.com/2008/04/17/future-pixars/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>ZoltarStark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storkpigelephant.com/2008/04/17/future-pixars/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Hmm, no Pixar films in 2009? Seriously? What are they thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, no Pixar films in 2009? Seriously? What are they thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LadyRostand</title>
		<link>http://storkpigelephant.com/2008/04/17/future-pixars/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>LadyRostand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storkpigelephant.com/2008/04/17/future-pixars/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t care about Toy Story 2 much and haven&#039;t seen Cars, but I really want to see WALL-E too! I&#039;d rather no second parts of any of the PIXAR films were made. I think they usually just repeat the same idea. The same holds true for non-animated films, mind you. Ok, maybe I wouldn&#039;t ming seeing The Incredibles 2, with Jack Jack as funny as he appears in the short film with the baby sitter. 

Hey, when you press on the Newt link to imdb, it goes to a page that says &quot;More information for this In Development project is only available on IMDbPro&quot;, has imdb decided to make reading some entries only available if you subscribe (pay them)? Like merrion-webster online has? Pity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t care about Toy Story 2 much and haven&#8217;t seen Cars, but I really want to see WALL-E too! I&#8217;d rather no second parts of any of the PIXAR films were made. I think they usually just repeat the same idea. The same holds true for non-animated films, mind you. Ok, maybe I wouldn&#8217;t ming seeing The Incredibles 2, with Jack Jack as funny as he appears in the short film with the baby sitter. </p>
<p>Hey, when you press on the Newt link to imdb, it goes to a page that says &#8220;More information for this In Development project is only available on IMDbPro&#8221;, has imdb decided to make reading some entries only available if you subscribe (pay them)? Like merrion-webster online has? Pity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

